Category: Let's talk
JUST AS WELL, I have OTHER SIMILAR BOARD-TOPICS to THIS, that are DEFINITELY INACTIVE, but SUCH TOPIC CAN AND WILL, at whichever time, RE-SURFACE--THIS HAS TO DO with the CONTROVERSIAL REALITY that the ONLY BARRIER between the SIGHTED AND the BLIND, is what I JUST DECIDED, RIGHT AS I'm WRITING, to label: "ONE-SIDED-ONLY-IGNORANCE," which is THAT on the part of DISGRUNTLED 20-20-SIGHTED FOLKS, ESPECIALLY--now, EVEN THOUGH I'll be as CLEAR as the CLEAREST of ALL that CLEAR could EVER BE on THIS SIDE OF ETERNITY, I EXPECT that there's ALWAYS going to STILL be SOME YOYO that's going to interject that I'm either BITTER, SELF-PITYING, ARROGANT, BLIND-COMMUNITY-MIS-REPPING, GENERALIZING ALL SIGHTED PEOPLE, having a CHIP ON MY SHOULDER, ETC., ETC., ETC., ANYWAY, which if they DO, it would DEFINITELY SUBSTANTIATE TOTALLY in MY favor, REGARDLESS--MEANWHILE, NOT ALL SIGHTED PEOPLE, 20-20, ESPECIALLY, would this EVER apply to.
QUESTION: what makes such "DISGRUNTLED?" The VERY FACT that the GENUINE LIFE of ANYONE that's either SIGHTED OR BLIND, by WHATEVER VISUAL-ACUITY LEVEL, although "SEPARATED by LANGUAGE," so to speak, while SIMULTANEOUSLY COMMUNICATING the EXACT, SAME MESSAGE, is the ABSOLUTE THREAT to the ABSOLUTE OPPOSITION, which would be the IGNORANT, of course, that EVER SO FOOLISHLY CLAIMS that such ISN'T the case, ONLY to risk being the VERY TARGET EXAMPLE of IRREVERSABLE, INCURABLE EMBARRASSMENT, when having been TOTALLY-UNEXPECTEDLY SHOWN UP, ESPECIALLY by ANOTHER 20-20-SIGHTED PEER, under the ABSOLUTELY-SECURED "TUTORLAGE (I HOPE I spelled correctly) of one that would be, JUST AS ESPECIALLY, a TOTALLY BLIND PEER!
I haven't a clue what your asking, but yes you did spell that correctly.
I don't know if anyone could possibly understand the point of this topic or what your question is. Maybe if you could use the period more than the comma, it might make a bit more since. You use the comma so much, it's sinful. Also, if you didn't make so many side notes, your subject might be more clear.
what is he saying?
I think he's saying:
"I made a board post. Listen to me! Read it, and give me more attention! That other board topic is getting old, so I created another one to gain more slaves and servants."
Lmaooooooo! I'm such a naughty troublemaker.
EXAMPLE: if YOU were a worker for the METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY of NEW YORK CITY (MTA), as either a BUS or TRAIN OPERATOR, and out of ALL the OTHER PASSENGERS that are 20-20-SIGHTED, ESPECIALLY, but JUST AS EQUALLY ABLE-FUNCTIONING as YOU, who cold be TOTALLY BLIND, ESPECIALLY, HE/SHE SELECTIVELY asks YOU, without EVER asking any of the OTHERS, where yo're geting OFF. Is THAT FAIR to ANY/ALL of the OTHERS, since ALL OF YOU are JUST AS ALLERT ENOUGH to KNOW WHEN to get off, REGARDLESS OF HIS/HER INTENTIONS?
Um, maybe I'm just too smart for my own good, but if anyone else can understand what was typed above, please expound!
Mr. Poopie Head, you still made too many side references. Why don't you just ask the question flat out instead of inserting all that other extra stuff? Maybe you'd actually get somewhere with this board topic if you did that.
And how can you give an example when the original question remains unknown?
I'm sorry. Please try again!
I think, instantiating the original propostrousness of the hillarity of whichever question the creator of this worthy topic expounded upon in such a way that, through the distorted perceptions of one less objectively and militarily, not to mention onions (although I just did) minded it is clear that the purpose of the original, not to be confused with elephants, thoughts as perceived through the twisted maze of conceptiolizations, direct exemplification notwithstanding it is clearly militant to proclaim visual acuity accounts for nothing more than grounds for discrimination rather than, as reality would have it, posing a formitable, though overcomeable, barrier to such every day existance activities undertaken by so many, not only with unaffected visual acuity but also those unfortunate enough to have a formof retina function deficiency and tomatoes rock. The very reality of uncertainty posed by inaccuarte and, sometimes, ambiguous methods such a one, inevitably and undesiredly, has to resort to such as counting ane ennumerating stops, whereby an unexpected and unscheduled, not unthinkable in the world of uncertainty, terrorism and overpriced vodka, stop such well thought out plans may cause a geographical confusion on a massive scale, even to the point where such a person suffering forementioned visual deprivation may disembark the very conceptual vehicle at a geographical location other than said individual originally intended, causing all sorts of StDs, in grown hair and undesired Russian bride's maids.
As such the sightedly gifted individual's desire to insure the insurance of a safe arrival for those with more problematic, if not entirely hindering to their lifestyles in any way, one would not dare to argue for such an impossibility and outright outrageous comment, last it causd descention within the ranks of the aforesaid individuals, may have to consider wearing pants.
fuck me people, talk bleeding english! sheieiet.
wildebrew, I know I've sort of dissed you in previous board topics, but what you just did there was fucking hilarious! You were actually able to write like Mr. Poopie Head? Now, that's what I call talent. I can't even write like that. You've got to teach me the art. That was spectacular!
Lmaooooooo! roflroflrofl
I'm going to die of laughter!
wildebrew, I know I've sort of dissed you in previous board topics, but what you just did there was fucking hilarious! You were actually able to write like Mr. Poopie Head? Now, that's what I call talent. I can't even write like that. You've got to teach me the art. That was spectacular!
Lmaooooooo! roflroflrofl
I'm going to die of laughter!
O my gosh, that was awesome Wildebrew. I slow down my jaws when I'm reading board posts or anything really, and I had to slow it down even more when I read your post to get all the stuff from it. Awesome work!
WB, did I ever tell you you're my hero? roflmao. honestly that saves me the trouble of coming up with something totally smart-ass for this topic...
er ... yeah, me too. rofl
OK, YOU BLUBBERING SIMPLETONS! DO YOU THINK THAT IT'S MORALLY FAIR that ANY ABLE-BODIED-20-20-SIGHTED INDIVIDUAL ISN'T EQUALLY TREATED as any JUST-AS-EQUALLY-ABLE-BODIED-LEGALLY-PARTIALLY/TOTALLY-BLIND INDIVIDUAL, PREFERENTIALLY? IF SO, or IF NOT, why? Must I make this ANY MORE SIMPLER?
Ok, so why exactly I'm responding to this I'm not sure, but apparently I'm too bored this morning for my own good.
I'm almost afraid to admit that I actually understood the original post to this question, but I'm not gonna go there.
I'm just gonna guess here, but I think that you encountered someone in society recently who feels that they're perfect and you are not. I'm guessing that you think they dissed you, even if they may not have meant it. You feel that they embarrassed themselves and added to your proof that many good sighted people are horrible, stupid, arrogant or what the fuck ever. Since you didn't state exactly what happened (thank God) we can only assume that you were asked something that you feel wouldn't normally be asked to a sighted person and that this pissed you of.
Well if you wanna get into talking about morals we'll be here for years, and I don't have that kinda time. You can however just face it that there are a lot of jerks out there and just let what they say go. You can re-evaluate to see if it's really this big of a deal and if they meant to upset you in this way. Either way, whatever the case just let it go. You're putting way more stress on yourself than what you need.
Everyone has a standard of right and wrong and everyone has their own set of morals, unfortunately there isn't one set that everyone follows and there never will be. Just learn to let things go and focus on you.
And to Wildebrew, that was very amusing!
what smart funny people!!!!! I love you wildebrew, raven, all you guys.
mygodchosenbride&i4lifefinally if you took the more away from in front of the simpler you'd looke a whole lot more intelligenter.
As I have said to you previously, respect is earned, courtesy is given. Since your nasty, whining, overbearing, poor me attitude obviously precludes anyone feeling respect for you, thank god there are some who still practice courtesy. I take it that you don't want to be treated preferentially. Good for you. Therefore, I can assume, which is dangerous, that you want to be treated as you treat others. Remember this guys. Treat him as he treats us. Oh yes, the person I pity in all this is his bride for life. Can you imagine waking up next to this ray of sunshine?
To that LAST POST, you're ABSOLUTELY INCORRECT--THIS PARANOIED THINKING of "THEY'RE PERFECT, I'M NOT" is DEFINITELY LAUGHABLE MATERIAL, but NO, NOT ME, AT ALL; what this IS, though, is the RESULT of a conversation that took place between a 20-20-sighted person and I, and it was THEY, NOT ME, although I WHOLE-HEARTEDLY SUPPORT, in TOTAL AGREEMENT, what they SAID, that expressed THEIR disapprooval of JUST-AS-EQUALLY-ABLE-FUNCTIONING-LEGALLY-PARTIALLY/TOTALLY-BLIND PEOPLE being PREFERENTIALLY TREATED, and was QUITE PLEASANTLY SURPRISED that I, having to be BLESSED to be TOTALLY BLIND, SINCE BIRTH, MYSELF, would've had the LOUD-PROUD-AND-BOLD AUDACITY to ACTUALLY AGREE with them. MEANWHILE, ANOTHER 20-20-sighted person, who WASN'T apart of OUR conversation, but having overheard, gave THEIR "UNWELCOMED (I DO SAY)" RESPONSE, by saying that I was a COMPLETE TRAITOR to (in THEIR "RIDICULOUS" words) ALL BLIND PEOPLE, WORLDWIDE, and that the FIRST person that I WAS talking with, should ONY HOPE that "GOD DOESN'T STRIKE YOU DEAD!", to which, we BOTH laughed, QUITE HYSTERICALLY, I'll CERTAINLY add, and without even ENGAGING this idiot in OUR conversation, resumed it, and as if that other person wasn't there, continued to share our expression of equal interaction, much to the utter discomfort of the IDIOT, who MIHT'VE SILENTLY-PERHAPS-SULKINGLY slipped away, HOPEFULLY to NEVER BE HEARD FROM AND/OR SEEN again.
"MIGHT'VE" was meant, of course, in my last post.
I ALSO meant: "ONLY," instead of "ONY."
Uhh! Try editing your posts before you post them. Wow.
You need to become a little more friendly with that period, eh?
ONLY IF I WANT TO, EH?!